PTR Followup

From an email with the guys at PTR:

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Serial range for paddle release
From: Zero (zero@commanderzero.com)
Date: Sun, April 10, 2016 2:39 am
To: “Info@ptr91.com” <Info@ptr91.com>

As a dealer, I’d rather get the newer models of PTR with the paddle release. When I call my vendor (RSR, CDNN, etc.) I can’t really ask them to look in the box and see if it has the paddle release or not. Is there a serial cutoff on the GI Model for the paddle introduction…something where I can ask the sales rep to check the serial # and know that way?
Reply:
 Thanks for getting in touch with us.
Due to us not always building our guns in sequential order, there is no way to know if a gun will have a paddle mag release by the serial number.
The best way to tell if a gun has a paddle mag release or not is to go off of the model number (when we started offering the paddle magazine releases and new 5/8×24″ threading, we changed the model numbers for all of our products).  Models with the paddle mag release and new 5/8×24″ threading will have models numbers starting with “PTR”, which will be followed by 3 digits (old models without the paddle mag release will have 6 digit model numbers in the following format “915XXX” for standard models, or “900XXX” for CA compliant models).  For instance, the model number of a G.I. with the paddle mag release will be PTR100.  The model number of a G.I. R with the paddle mag release will be PTR101.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Chris Petersen

Customer Service Manager
PTR Industries
101 Cool Springs Dr. | Aynor, SC 29511
Tel: 843.358.2222 | Fax: 843.358.2223
sales@ptr91.com | www.ptr91.com

 

PTR-91 updates

One of the biggest hassles of the HK91 series of rifles is that the original paddle magazine release had to be omitted in order to meet ATFE’s guidelines. (Short version: the way the paddle release was built into the gun allowed the use of full-auto parts. To import the gun, the capacity to accept full auto parts had to be removed.) The result is a somewhat awkward button mag release.

No more. PTR, whose products I rather like, announced that “As of 1/1/16, G.I.’s will come with 5/8×24″ barrel threading and a paddle magazine release”. About dang time. Plus, the standard threading to the muzzle will allow silencers and other muzzle devices that normally were difficult to mount because of the metric (15×1) threading of the muzzle.

G3 mags are still some of the cheapest mags out there. With the advent of the paddle magazine release, and the ability to use ‘common’ or ‘standard’ .308 muzzle devices, the PTR series of rifles is looking like an even better choice for those wanting something with some .308 horsepower. As of this moment, CDNN shows them on sale for $849..but you might want to double check and make sure its a newer model with the paddle.

Comic book altruism goes bigscreen

Comic book movies are pretty big these days. Of special note is the theme that is being brought up in these new movies. The recent Batman versus Superman movie, and the upcoming Captain America movie, both address a very interesting sociological idea that , to me, seems to be one that comes up every so often and needs to be put down like a rabid skunk.

Over 30 years ago, a ‘groundbreaking’ graphic novel came out – The Dark Knight Returns. Succinctly, it was about an aged and retired Batman who throws off retirement, squeezes back into the tights, and takes up the mantle once more for a final showdown. Large parts of the fight from the book are replayed in the recent movie. But what is interesting is that in the book the various superheroes are gone. Government decided they were too ‘uncontrolled’ and forced them to retire or leave the planet…or else. Superman remains as a ‘licensed superhero’ and agent of the government, secretly using his powers as ordered by the government.

Fast forward a couple years and ‘Watchmen’ hits the screens. Same underlying sinister theme – superheroes are loose cannons. Operating independently,  without government control, they are too dangerous to be allowed to continue. They are forced to retire, go rogue, or work for the government.

Move ahead another ten years and you have ‘Iron Man 2’, where the government demands that ‘the Iron Man weapon” be turned over to the government for the benefit of ‘the American people’.

In the most recent Superman movie the question is raised – if Superman is so all-powerful, what prevents him from becoming a threat to the rest of the world? He can do things no one else can, and has amazing powers..doesn’t he therefore have a responsibility to the world to selflessly, tirelessly, save it from itself?

This is coming to a head in the new Captain America movie where various superheroes have to pick sides (the ‘Civil War’ storyline). When the .gov demands that superheroes be under .gov authority and control some agree that they need to be regulated, and some wish to remain independent. Naturally, this leads to massive CGI battles between the two sides.

See the new Deadpool movie? Colossus, the big shiny X-Man, has a minor role in the movie. In his first appearance in the comics, way back when, he was approached by Professor X at his Soviet collective farm. Xavier asks him to join the X-Men because of his newly manifested powers. Colossus, being a good Soviet, was dubious..believing his powers belonged to the State. Xavier, of course, tells him that his powers are his but that he has a duty to mankind as a whole.

The common (or is it communist?) theme is that if you have some sort of special ability, talent, or resource, you have a moral responsibility to use it for the greater good.

What’s this got to do with you, you ask? Well, you could argue that this decades long theme of self-sacrifice, obligation to ‘the greater good’, and social responsibility is part of a larger indoctrination process. But..I don’t believe that. What I do believe, and I think you should too, is that more and more people are growing up in their impressionable years with the idea being pushed at them constantly that you have a duty to others, they have a right to demand of you, and that any resistance to that notion is selfish, anti-establishment (or anti-government), or just plain misanthropic.

We see it from time to time when someone says that you have to help..after all, you have so much and they have nothing. We’ve all heard stories about how in times of crisis the governments (local ones, usually) will seize someones resources to be used to alleviate others suffering. Sometimes the police and city government commandeer your four-wheel drive vehicle after a major blizzard, and sometimes they help themselves to your surplus store inventory because they need it and you have it.

When the power goes out, and you have your generator humming away, it’ll be unsurprising how many people will ‘demand’ that you accommodate them because ‘you have it and I dont’. You have a responsibility, you see, to the less prepared and less fortunate. (And, yes, the less intelligent.)

The last couple decades of movies have brought this notion of social obligation and social responsibility to the point where the word ‘individualist’ is seen as a pejorative term. There have been a few attempts to spread a better message…Joss Whedon’s Serenity movie (and Firefly series) was an excellent message of individual-resisting-overreaching-government. (And was, in fact, basically a retelling of post Civil War Reconstruction society.) To a lesser degree, shows like The Walking Dead demonstrate agency rather than passive ‘governemnt will save us’ attitudes. The exceptionally (so far) lame ‘Fear The Walking Dead’ companion series had some ‘government is not always the answer’ moments in there as well.

I love comic book movies. I thought Deadpool was the best one in years (because, hey, rated R), and the Captain America movie will be one of the best, I think. But be careful not to fall into the trap of ignoring the underlying message that is sometimes there…the notion that anyone ‘better’ than the rest must be reined in and controlled for the benefit of the ‘greater good’, that the ‘haves’ have a duty to sacrifice for the ‘have nots’ (or ‘will nots’), and that regulation and government oversight is a benevolent and just form of ‘justice’. Whether youre wearing tights with a big ‘S’ on the chest, or wearing 5.11 pants and a Leatherman tool, someone is thinking that you ‘have to’ because ‘you can’…and if you won’t, they’ll use the power of law and .gov to make you live up to ‘your responsibility’.

Tavor experience

The AR series of rifles have their ups and downs, but they are the most common rifle to come across in this country. The ergonomics are quite nice, and they do tend to be accurate. The drawbacks include the direct impingement gas system (which, to be fair, may not be as big a deal as some folks make it out to be) and the rather small and easily lost parts that make up it’s innards.

Various guns have come out to try and topple the AR and none seem to succeed. The AR is an excellent example of a system that remains dominant, despite better systems being available, simply through ubiquity.

The Tavor was supposed to be a challenge to the AR and, for the Israelis, it did in fact compete successfully. As the Tavor has started showing up in more numbers here, I finally got to shoot one the other day. Sadly, it will not make me give up the AR for my .223 needs.

No doubt, it’s a handy rifle. It’s compact profile makes it a darling for the tight confines of vehicles and the like. Unfortunately, for me, that’s about all it offered. The iron sights, an afterthought at best, are unprotected and stick up like a flagpole off the Tavor’s flattop receiver. I’ve no doubt that a drop from any height onto a hard surface will bend them or snap them off. To be fair, they are emergency backup sights…not meant for everyday use. But the iron sights on my AR are very well protected and easily adjustable.

The trigger…well, it’s a bullpup. You do the math.

My biggest complaint was getting lungfuls of propellant gas when shooting more than a few rounds at once. While the ejection port is right next to your cheek, your face is up towards the front of the gun where the gas, it seems, vents from the piston.

The forend seemed unnecessarily bulky and unwieldy, the safety lever rubbed irritatingly into my thumb, and the low bore axis made for an odd cheekweld with open sights.

All in all, I just didn’t like it. I’ve shot the MSAR STG556, a copy of the AUG (sorta), and found it to be more likable than the Tavor.

But…neither one really offers anything that is paramount enough to make me give up the AR. This isn’t to say the AR is the best .223 rifle. Rather it’s to say that given the huge distribution of the AR in this country, and the enormous aftermarket parts, and the ease of logistics, there isn’t anything offered by the Tavor to make me give those up.

If you have an AR already, there’s nothing here for you, in my opinion. If you haven’t gottten a .223 rifle and are in the market for one, I’d not recommend the Tavor unless you really have a thing for bullpups. In a perfect world I’d have a safe full of HK93s, but given the ubiquity of the AR platform…….

Gun show AAR

I guess I spoke too soon…ol’ Johnny Trochman was there at the show after all. While he is definitely a proud wearer of the tinfoil chapeau he does have a very nice selection of things that would be useful to those in our particular interest. Plus, for pure fun and games, nothing beats a case of these:

20160401_151656The parachute flares are especially fun if you’ve a creative mind and a modicum of McGyver in you…coupled with a rat trap, cordage, and a few odds and ends, they can be used to make perimeter warning devices. Plus, theyre just fun to play with. If you’ve the mind, you can use the smoke cannisters just as creatively. It would be interesting to dissect one and see if the pull-ring igniter could be replaced with something electronic.

AR and AK rifles were aplenty, though there did seem to be a lack of used Glocks there. Ammo was available at the usual prices, but, as is the norm, .22 ammo was somewhat scarce.

The only thing that made me covetous was a rather worn HK91 for $1800. Honestly, I’d take the $1800 and buy a pair of PTR-91 rifles and not feel that i’m really missing anything other than a little prestige.

All in all, a rather good show. There’s one here in town at the fairgrounds this weekend and I plan on walking through. Its a rather smallish show, but any gun show is usually better than no gun show.