Metaphorically speaking;

We’ve all heard stories about women who live with husbands that slap them around and otherwise hurt them..sometimes quite severely. Broken nose, black eyes, maybe a couple cracked ribs. And we, aghast at this, say “Get out of there. Pack your things and go!” and she says that he isnt a bad husband, its just that sometimes he gets drunk.or she ‘makes him do it’…or otherwise makes excuses. And we ask, after she’s had to wear a scarf to hide the handprints around her neck, why she doesnt leave? And she says that she cant make it on her own, or that she wants the security and its worth the tradeoff, or that her kids need his help, or something similar.

Now, lets replace a few words…..

We’ve all heard stories about women citizens who live with husbands governments that slap push them around and otherwise hurt abuse them..sometimes quite severely. Broken nose, black eyes, maybe a couple cracked ribsNo knock warrants, punishing taxes, curtailed liberties. And we, aghast at this, say “Get out of there. Pack your things and go!” and she they says that he it  isnt a bad husband government, its just that sometimes he it  gets drunk on power..or she they ‘makes him them do it’…or otherwise makes excuses. And we ask, after she’s they’ve had to wear a scarf to hide the handprints national ID around her their neck, why she doesntthey dont leave? And shethey says that she they cant make it on her their own, or that she they wants the security and its worth the tradeoff, or that her their kids need his governements help, or something similar.

Next time someone says that the goal of government is to take care of those who cant take care of themselves, think about that battered woman in the doublewide. You’d urgently try to convince her that she didnt need that abusive husband and that she could do fine without him and she could do fine on her own…same situation.

And, like the abused women who stay with their scumbag husbands/boyfriends, if you continue to stay after everyone has tried to convince you how bad and dangerous it is….well, you may not deserve what you get but youre going to get it anyway. (It is worth noting that there is almost universal satisfaction when one of these abusers is shot by the abusee…)

I think about this because I think the events of the last several weeks are going to push alot of fence-sitters into one of two camps – the ‘government is there to help the helpless and if they cant do it then we need to make government bigger and more powerful’ camp, on the left side of the fence. On the right side, we have the ‘government cant pour piss out of a boot if they printed the instructions on the heel..I’m going to do all I can so that I’ll never need to depend on them’ camp. If youre reading this I can imagine which side of the fence youre on.

It would be very easy to say that the people who had literally nothing left but the clothes on their back approve of the government supporting them, at least for the short term. And it would be very easy to say that the folks that rode out the storm and survived quite handily through their own foresight and resourcefullness would be disdainful of making government even bigger to enable it to react better/faster.
But thats not necessarily the case…there were plenty of ‘clothes on their back’ refugees who shunned the FEMA man and beat feet to a relatives or friends home and ‘kept it in the family’. And theres folks that had plenty of food and water who were more than happy to head down to the FEMA tent and collect free goodies they didnt need. So, you cant really pigeonhole a particular survivor into one of those two scenarios…it goes to who the person fundamentally is, not what the circumstances made them.

My point is, I think, that in the future it will be very interesting to see what side wins out, who got bumped from one ideal to the other, and who is supporting a particular ideal. Personally, Im of the opinion that government is very rarely the answer for personal safety and preparedness against disaster. National defense? Sure. Building roads? I suppose. Protecting me from natural disaster? Hardly. I’ll take care of that on my own, thanks.

Also, given the phenominally poor response of the ‘gov, coupled with the sheeple doing their sheeple thing, its obvious that .gov can’t protect you…at all. So if youre counting on them to keep you safe, youre really, really screwed and should come over to my side of the fence before its too late.

11 thoughts on “Metaphorically speaking;

  1. The women in those relationships develop a learned helplessness over time, something we can see parallels with in the relationship between citizens and government. Many women don’t leave those relationships because of fear: fear of losing their children, their homes, their lives. If we can’t check the control government has been given over our lives, that’s where we’re headed. By the time the sheeple realize the danger in the relationship and want out, I fear the control will be so great that getting out will mean risking everything. Extension of the Crime Control Act of 1984 that Bush, Sr. engineered to things like gun ownership, etc., could allow the government to take everything one owns without so much as charges being filed and a day in court.

    I’m greatly encouraged that, with few exceptions, everyone I know is on our side of the fence these days. I think the big problem is the front line of the battle is so broad now, no one knows how to go about fighting back.

  2. Recent events may well be pushing fence-sitters into those camps, but I’m also seeing a bit of the reverse: lifelong sheeple saying “Whoah, Nanny didn’t save those folks” and starting to pay attention to individual preparedness. It warms my heart, it does.

  3. Thanks as always for the heads up, CZ.

    It definitely was a wake up call, watching the events in the aftermath of the catastrophy. Not to say that I’m sure those who rely on the abusiveness of their relationship with the government did not appreciate the bonus, knee-jerk reaction ATM cards.

    I think another related issue is waking up the minds of those who lean conservative government. This “conservative government” is certainly not into the GOP ideal of old–small government–unless the new ideal is Big US Government overseas, which certainly won’t win my support.

  4. Noob question follows…

    I would have posted this in an earlier thread but did not read mag thread ’til this morning.

    What is the average shelf life for ammo? I have the standard army issue OD cases with the gaskets and I am storing Wolf brand 7.62×39 and Federal .45 Hydra-Shoks in them. How often do I need to replace it? I live in a high-humidity environment (Houston) and these are steel-cased rounds. Do I need to buy silica gel packs and store them with it?

    Thanks,
    Crom

  5. Re: Noob question follows…

    The Wolf stuff is normally lacquer-sealed, so its pretty watertight right off the bat. Assuming the ammo cans are in good shape, and you might toss a little dessicant or a n old tube sock full of shattered drywall in there, the ammo should be good for the rest of your life. Military-grade ammo lasts indefinitely. I’ve shot 30+ year old stuff with no hiccups and buddies of mine have shot some twice that old. The trick is good storage and ammo cans work best…esp. since thats what they were designed for! The commercial non-sealed ammo, like the Hydra Shocks, should last at least twenty years or so stored in an ammo can…in reality, they’ll last longer than you will.

Comments are closed.