Article – Wildlife agents kill black bear after attack on camper in Bob Marshall

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

Satterfield said a team of wildlife agents flew into the remote area by helicopter to track down the animal, which they spotted 30 yards from the injured man’s campsite. The bear had pepper spray on its fur and blood in its claws, he said.

 

Pepper spray is not the panacea that some would have you think it is. Then again, neither are bullets. I’ve only come across bears a couple times when I’ve been out fishing or hunting. Once, I came across a cub standing in the middle of the logging road at which point every sense went on alert asking “where’s momma bear?”. I was a bit undergunned that time since all I had was my P35 with me. Second time was when I was quietly sitting on the side of a hill and saw a black bear come running across my field of view, follower a few moments later by my hunting buddy running after it. Apparently he liked to chase black bears because if you got the running downhill, their butt end would eventually flip over their head and they’d go cartwheeling down the hill. Whatever. I was a little better armed that time with a FAL.

Sometimes bear spray works, sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes bullets work, sometimes they don’t. Play it safe and cover all the bases.

True story: I met the guy who developed the Counter Assault bear spray. He’s the guy in the promotional literature with blood all over his head from being mauled only moments before the picture was taken. Back then the stuff was sold as ‘pepper spray’ and the words ‘bear repellent’ on the can had been crossed out. I asked why and was told that to sell it as pepper spray for use against people was perfectly cool, but to market it as bear repllenet you had to do studies to show that it gave no lasting injuries to the bear. Go figure.

 

Article – Gun Sales Hinge on Obama Re-Election

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

As Cabela’s Inc. prepares the selection of guns it will sell for the holiday season and winter hunting, the outdoor-gear retailer has two plans: one if President Barack Obama is re-elected, and one if he isn’t.

 

Old news, man. This stuff is as predictable as the seasons. Election year = article about Americans buying more guns.

But…let’s go off the track for a second and play ‘what if’. If you look at, say, the last 75 years of gun legislation as a whole you can definitely see a trend where the pool of ‘permitted’ firearms and firearms owners gets smaller and smaller. Obviously, there’s only a certain level of restriction that can be approached before public sentiment becomes politically unmanageable. Things like machine guns, which were heavily regulated around 70 years ago, caught another hit when they were prohibited from being manufactured for anyone except military and law enforcement. (Which, naturally, drove a $400 Uzi purchased in 1984 into being an $8000 Uzi 25 years later.)

The 1994 Assault Weapons ban was about as close as we’ve seen to a stroke-of-a-pen ban on certain styles of firearms. If nothing else, the AW ban of ’94 gave us a glimpse of what a future ban (or obscenely prohibitive regulation process) would look like.

Obviously, the biggest thing, short of banning the guns themselves, would be a ban or regulation against ‘high capacity’ (whatever that means) magazines. Unlike last time, there probably wouldn’t be a grandfather clause for mags made before the ban.

Another import ban would be easy to achieve using ATFE’s notorious ‘sporting clause’ rule. Guys like SIG, HK, FN, Saiga, etc., would either have to move their manufacturing to the US or drop their product line. This was already done back in the late ’80s which is why an HK91 costs $3000.

Having trimmed the supply of magazines, and cut off the flow of imported guns, domestic manufacturers will ramp up production of the AR-15 since everyone is making one. Limited to a ten-round (or less) magazine, most folks will have no problem coming up with old GI mags. However, domestic production will probably have to go back to the no flash suppressor, no bayonet lug, no pistol grip designs. Existing guns probably will be grandfathered in because of the sheer numbers and because no one wants to be the person to start the legendary ‘door to door gun confiscations’ that the Alex Jones crowd have been yelling about. A new firearms classification, like they have in Canada, may come into being with evil black rifles being regulated like suppressors or SBR’s – intrusive licensing and controls.

Let’s look back at a reasonable timeline…something that will fit into most of our lives. Let’s look back thirty years. In 1982 full-auto machineguns were still being made for civillian use, you could buy HK, FN, Steyr, Uzi, etc. carbines all day long. Buying a handgun was as simple as filling out a one-page yellow sheet at the gun counter and walking out the door with it. No place in the US, as far as I can tell, had a ban on magazines holding a certain number of cartridges. Within a few more years you’d be able to buy drum-fed semi-auto shotguns, cases of cheap AK ammo for $85/case, SKS rifles for $75, and all the cheap Chinese ammo you wanted. And that was all within most of our lifetimes ago. So, yeah, things can change pretty dramatically in a short time.

Most folks will calmly point to the Heller decision and say that they have nothing to worry about. Interestingly, the guys making the new laws will point to the Heller decision and say the same thing. With established precedent in the form of the various Gun Control Acts, your right to own a firearm will still exist, it’s just that your choices will be kinda slimmed down.

Now, let’s drop back into reality for a moment….do I really think that this sort of thing will happen? Absolutely. I have 100% certainty it will happen. I am as certain of it as I am of the sun rising tomorrow. But I don’t know when it will happen. I don’t see it happening anytime ‘soon’. Within my lifetime, assuming I live to be around 80, absolutely. A law changed here, a rule changed there, all over the course of twenty or thirty years. But do I believe that something like I just described will happen in the next four years of an Obama second term? Nope. I believe it’s possible, and I believe that some aspects of it might be trotted out, but do I believe the whole grandiose disarmament plan will occur within the next four years? Nope.

But, since I believe it will happen someday, I’d like to be prepared for it. So, while the stuff is still available, I buy what I can.

Sales. camo II, QE3

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

Well, the local Kmart closes for good this weekend. I figured I’d head over there and check to see if there was anything left I couldn’t live without. As it turns out, whatever was left was knocked down to 50-60% off, but the things I was after..first aid supplies…were long gone and all that remained were made-in-China medical supplies that I was in no way going to acquire.

I figured that the good stuff would be gone before this point so Im glad I stocked up when it was 37% off.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

As some folks pointed out to me, not all the digital camo was an uninspired flop. Apparently the Army digital camo is the one just about everyone agrees doesnt quite hold water. The other branches’ patterns seem to be meeting with different results.

For those of you who have an interest in camo and it’s development around the world, here’s a link to a resource you might like: kamouflage.net

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

QE3? The .gov is promising to spend $40 billion a month to by mortgage-backed securities in order to decrease unemployment. Did I read that right? I’m no economist but I’m having a tough time seeing the relationship between underperforming mortgage-backed securities and unemployment. Are jobs somehow not being created because banks and other institutions are holding a security that is underperformng? I’m not sure exactly how that works. As I see it, the only way banks affect unemployment is by affecting the availability of capital for use by businesses. Since the Fed has kept interests rates so low that banks can borrow money at virtually no cost, how can any bank not have the capital to provide to businesses to create jobs?

And while I may not understand where the correlation is between mortgage-backed securities and unemployment, I can understand that .gov is going to be getting that $40 billion to spend every month from…where? Oh, thats right….they have a printing press.

I wonder if this explains gold and silvers interesting price changes as of late.

 

Dog musings

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

You never read about cats doing this sort of thing…….

Loyal dog ran away from home to find his dead master’s grave – and has stayed by its side for six years

And he’s not the only one.
While I love my dog I would hope he would know that, should I die before he does, I’d like him to go on with his life and be happy….not spend his remaining years hanging out wherever they spread my ashes.

Link – camo

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

I love some of the new camo patterns that are coming out these days. I was quite taken with Multicam but as of late I’m starting to take a real shine to A-tacs patterns as well. Obviously, the best camo, for whatever reason you think you need something camouflaged, is the pattern that blends into as much of your anticipated AO as possible, right? So, obviously some patterns are going to be more conducive to some environments than others.

A buddy of mine emailed me a link to a very interesting camouflage used in Norway. The pattern seems ideal for places with lotsa rocks and moss. Not exactly a great choice here in my dry mountains but elsewhere it might be just the ticket.

In a related note, from the same source, comes a link to the new snow camo now being available.

As the US military starts moving away from the failed digital patterns, expect to see a lot of manufacturers dumping their now-outdated products on the clearance racks.

A post like this kinda-sorta opens the door to the question of why the need for camouflage at all? Am I planning on creeping around undetected after the apocalypse, sniping at invading UN troops and hordes of cannibal bikers? Well, certainly, thats not ‘Plan A’..

No, simple truth is that sometimes you don’t want folks finding your stuff. If, for whatever reason, I have to ditch my pack and hide it under a log or some such it would be nice if that gear blended in enough so that when I came back to retrieve it it was still there.

Canteens and legacy gear

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

Ever read the book version of the second Rambo movie? They’re gearing up Rambo to drop into the Vietnam jungle and they give him some razoo night-opticed, suppressed, select fire, machine pistol (In the movie, an MP5SD with an early laser sight) and say how it’s the latest and greatest. Rambo says “Thats really nice, sir, but what I really would like is an AK-47.” The guy equipping him snorts and says “An AK-47? Hell, every twelve-year-old in Vietnam has one of those!” “Exactly.”

See the line of reasoning there?

Ever hear the expression ‘legacy weapon’? Or ‘legacy gear’? It means a system of something (weapon, computer, whatever) that has been in use and around a particular place so long that it has become organic to the environment. A good example would be the Airtronic RPG. Since RPG rockets abound over in places like Afghanistan and Iraq, why  not make a well-made launcher to take advantage of the latest in materials and technology so you can use the plentiful legacy ammo? Kinda like making AR’s that take AK mags and shoot AK ammo.

I mention this because, if you’re into preparedness for any amount of time, you eventually wind up with legacy gear. An good example would be the old ALICE gear. Back in the 80′s and even the 90′s this was the most modern stuff available on the surplus market and many of us wound up with plenty of gear that used this system. Nowadays the technology, designs and materials have changed and our older gear is not only out-of-date but may not be at all compatible or useful with the new gear. (To take advantage of ALICE legacy gear, some outfits make rucksacks that mount onto the old ALICE frames….smart.)

One of the gifts I got for my birthday was the Nalgene Canteen. It’s a good example of new materials being used to make stuff compatible with the older ‘legacy gear’…in this case, canteen carriers, cups, etc. The GI canteens are fine, but in my experience they hold odors and it would be nice to be able to see how much remains inside (as well as be able to see if anything is growing inside them). The standard Nalgene bottles are awesome in this role but they require special carriers and don’t fit as well in gear that was designed around the shape and footprint of the GI canteen.

So, let’s get down to the job at hand. How are these things vs. the standard OD plastic GI canteen we’ve all got banging around in our piles of gear?

First, a side by side comparison.

(L.) Nalgene Canteen, (R.) USGI Canteen

Does it fit in the usual canteen cover? Yes.

Does it fit in the canteen cup? Sorta. It’s a snug fit and does not fit as well as the GI canteen. The result is that a cup/canteen combo using the Nalgene may not fit into the legacy canteen cover. However, there are several new style canteen covers out there that it will fit into…although then we’ve gone from new gear/legacy combo to new gear/new gear combo.

Not a great fit with the USGI canteen cup unless you use a newer, looser fit canteen cover.

Capacity is the same as pretty much everything else. US GI canteen = US GI 1 liter canteen = Nalgene canteen = Nalgene bottle. No matter how you slice it, youre getting at least 32 ounces of water.

(L. – R.) Standard Nalgene bottle, USGI 1-liter square canteen, Nalgene Canteen, USGI canteen … all hold 32~ oz. liquid.

Surprisngly, the Nalgene is actually 8% heavier than the USGI canteen. The Nalgene clocks in around 4.65 oz. and the GI canteen comes in around 4 oz. I’ts a bit surprising since the GI canteen seemd to be a bit…thicker….but apparently the Nalgene is packing a little bit of extra weight somewhere. From a durability standpoint I’d say both are about as indestructible a piece of gear as you can make for carrying water.

Preferences? Well, I rather like the round wide-mouth Nalgene bottle for it’s incredible durability, excellent aftermarket accessories and the wide-mouth. But, the Nalgene canteen lets me use most of my existing gear that accomodates the GI canteen. Additionally, I like the transparent nature of the Nalgene compared to the USGI since it lets me know how much liquid remains and if anything is growing in the canteen.

I’ll probably wind up phasing out the GI canteens and replacing them with either the Nalgene bottles or the Nalgene canteens. The USGI ones will get bumped down to secondary or tertiary level backups. All in all, though, the Nalgene canteen seems to be a good choice to replace the GI canteen and still have the advantage of most of the GI canteen accessories.

Article – You don’t bring a 3D printer to a gun fight — yet

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

The hobby is best known for creating colorful toys and trinkets, but some enthusiasts are working on design files that would allow anyone to print a working gun. These don’t exist yet, but some believe it’s only a matter of time.
Why would a 3D-printed gun be appealing? For one, it could potentially be cheap. You can buy a preassembled 3D printer for about $500. A spool of ABS plastic to print with goes for $50. Depending on where you shop, you can buy .38 Special ammunition for 30 cents a round. The plans will undoubted be distributed free like so many MP3s.

Building an AR receiver isn’t exactly rocket science. And since there’s virtually no stresses in the lower, you can make it out of almost any rigid material. I saw some post somewhere where a guy built one out of that white plastic they use for cutting boards.

This is an interesting article but it tells us nothing we dont already know – yeah, it’s perfectly legal to make a gun for your own use as long as it’s not a Title II full auto or similar.

The folks that are going to get their panties in a twist about this are the same folks who probably don’t realize that nay yahoo with a credit card and a quick trip to Home Depot can buy enough materials and tools to fab up receivers all day long. Let’s face it – some gun designs just ain’t much of a challenge. Heck, some gun designs were developed specifically to be suitable for ‘cottage production’… Stens and that sorta thing.

The sinister thing here is that this could be used to argue that more parts of a firearm should be regulated. If you have an AR lower you can buy uppers all day long with no regulation, right? And since the AR lower is easy to fab up, it’s the barreled upper that would be the real bottleneck. In some countries, thats actually how it plays out…go look at your Glock sometime…notice the frame, barrel and slide are serial numbered…thats because in some countries those individual parts are the ‘controlled parts’. In the use, the controlled part is the receiver…in some European countries, its the barrel….in others, the slide.

3D printing definitely opens up some interesting avenues, I gotta admit. I’m just not sure it’s going to revolutionize gun manufacturing although I can see it revolutionizing gun designing.

Article – Gun Sales Surge, Buckzilla

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

Gun Sales Surge: An Obama Bounce?

Smith & Wesson stock Friday was zooming, thanks to a stellar earnings report. The firearms maker also boosted its outlook for the rest of the year. Because of the strong business, its backlog of orders more than doubled from the same quarter last year, the company is concentrating on boosting production and building inventory.

“We are underserving the market at this moment, we all know that, and that’s a great opportunity going forward for us,” CEO James Debney said in a conference call with analysts.

And another gun maker, Sturm, Ruger & Co., also hit a milestone of sorts in terms of meeting consumer demand. It produced its one-millionth gun of the year…well ahead of last year’s pace.

This happens every election year. It goes in four stages:

  • Stage I – Before the election, in the months leading up to it, there’s a surge in purchasing
  • Stage II – Immediately before the election and afterwards there’s another surge
  • Stage III – As inauguration comes closer, theres another surge
  • Stage IV – Right after inauguration there’s another surge

Guys, this is as predictable as a Kennedy wife being cheated on. It happens every election, no matter who wins. Heck, if you’re the type who likes to speculate on markets, load up on guns, ammo and magazines and unload them right before the next presidential election…gold mine.

You and me, though….we’re all squared away so panic-buying urges don’t affect us, right? Right?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Speaking of guns, I saw this monster on the way to the shop this morning:

Me and Nuke were taking our usual route down the alleys and this deer just made me stop in my tracks. They were a bit concerned about Nuke but he was pretty okay with them. Of course, I didnt get too close with the dog …that would be asking for trouble. Notice that he broke off one tine on his left side….that would have been 7 points on that side. Big rack on that sucker.

How come I never see these guys during hunting season when I’m prowling the woods with my PTR-91????

Article – Seriously? Government warns citizens of ‘zombie apocalypse’ to urge bett

Originally published at Notes From The Bunker. You can comment here or there.

WASHINGTON – “The zombies are coming!” the Homeland Security Department says.

Tongue firmly in cheek, the government urged citizens Thursday to prepare for a zombie apocalypse, part of a public health campaign to encourage better preparation for genuine disasters and emergencies. The theory: If you’re prepared for a zombie attack, the same preparations will help during a hurricane, pandemic, earthquake or terrorist attack.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency hosted an online seminar for its Citizen Corps organization to help emergency planners better prepare their communities for disaster. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last year first launched a zombie apocalypse social media campaign for the same purposes.

You know, I first posted about this about four years ago how zombies were becoming the metaphor for preparing against the end of the world. When you you push that cart with six cases of canned tuna through the checkout at CostCo and folks give you that weird look you somehow get more miles out of replying with “I’m preparing for the zombie apocalypse” rather than “Im preparing for the eventual economic collapse of this country”. Strange but true…it’s more acceptable to prepare for the zombies than it is for the ‘real’ disasters.

Additionally, I don’t think .gov is really thinking this through. If a person isn’t motivated to prepare for the real threats that are out there what makes .gov think that they’ll prepare for the imaginary threats? Do they really think that the folks in New Orleans who can’t be bothered to prepare for hurricanes will bother to prepare for zombies?

If .gov really wants folks to prepare then , by Crom, let them show some real willingness to help….open up the military bases to allow civillians to purchase surplus clothes and gear at rock bottom prices, donate unused military bases to state governments as emergency command centers, promote tax-free purchases on survival related gear, etc, etc, etc. Tell you what, man…if I were president (or even governor of my happy little state) I’d be all over that stuff….