Just not what I expected

So, having been into preparedness (or survivalism) for the last thirty years, you would think that would have been ridiculously ample time to get squared away for something like the Current Situation. So, why the sudden frenzy of buying?

Well, virtually all of my projected scenarios involved some sort of grid-down type of scenario where we are hoarding gasoline, hunkering down, without electricity, listening to our wind-up radios, and that sort of thing. That’s the scenario where you crack open the #10 cans of freezedrieds. As a result, I’ve been prepared for that sort of thing for a while now.

But this particular flavor of apocalypse, so far, has been different. I doesn’t feel dire enough to break into $65 #10 cans of freeze-dried meats. Rather, I can still go to Costco, for now, and buy a flat of pork chops or a 10# brick of 85/15 ground beef. And its that ‘normal’, day-to-day food that I’m winding up going long on right now.

Other stuff like soap, rice, batteries, detergent, aluminum foil, etc….thats all fine… at 100+% on those. But that everyday stuff was a bit lighter than I would have thought and that’s where the focus is now.

As I’ve mentioned, the Current Situation will be a fascinating and illuminating experience to see what does and does not work as far as preparations go. So far, other than what I’ve mentioned, I’ve been fairly pleased. I am especially pleased that in the last few years my focus has moved into financial preparations..eliminating debt and socking away money in case something happened. That, more than the 5-gallon buckets of rice, seems to be the most comforting thing so far.

“So far”…you catch how many times I’ve used that in this post? There is no guarantee that what we are experiencing now will be the same thing we experience later. In fact, it’s virtually guaranteed that it will not. It may be worse, it may be better, but it will be different. For me, in my location, right now, the biggest prep is money. Lotta folks with cut or reduced hours, closed or restricted businesses, etc. For them, it’s living on savings and credit cards. I’ve been adamant about having more than one income stream and, sure enough, if one takes a hit the other can still keep some green coming in. That’s working out as I had hoped. But, thats how things are so far… tomorrow could be an entirely different (and worse) story.

Even the clueless idiots out there are catching on to things being a little squirrely. I don’t see anyone buying 4k televisions, jet skis, or pro gaming computers. When even those people, who normally ‘live for today’, curb their spending you know that the situation has reached a level of seriousness that is unprecedented.

Of course, because of that, the businesses that are open are seeing reduced sales revenue as well. If anyone at the local car dealerships is doing even 1/3 of their normal sales volume, I’d be surprised. I think we might see some very interesting sales and promotions coming up from many different businesses and markets as they try to drive up sales to meet their fixed costs. If you actually do have some ‘disposable income’ you might do very very well on buying a few goodies in the future. Heck, I should go troll Craigslist and see if I can pick up another EU200 or something.

So, here we are a month or two into the largest ‘disaster’ any of us have seen in our lifetimes and…so far….not what I expected. I have always thought the apocalypse was going to be either a ‘real’ one with Katrina-like infrastructure failures and lawlessness, or an economic crisis that, actually, closely parallels what we are in now but without the face masks. Either way, I do feel vindicated about both, the stockpiling of freezedrieds and the financial contortions I’ve gone though to get the finances resilient.

Observations

As many of you, I am sure, have noticed…a good part of my postings aren’t so much about what I’m doing as much as they are about what Im seeing. Couple reasons for that…first of all, I’m fine. I’ve got food, fuel, supplies, etc. So do you. So there’s no need for the back-patting festival of constant posts saying “People were on line for [item] but I had plenty…”.

What I do wind up posting about is the details about how this is all unfolding and what the takeaway from it is. What worked, what didnt, why didnt it work, why did it, what should I have done, what shouldnt I have done, and so forth. In short, we’re in the middle of a global experiment in disaster management, what can we observe and learn from it? Disaster planning rarely gets a global-level real world event to examine, dissect and learn from. Katrina was the benchmark for hurricane preparedness modeling, Kung Flu is going to be the benchmark for how pandemic planning is to be planned. In reality, there’ll be a lot of ‘white papers’, death by PowerPoint, committee’s and hearings, and then very little will actually be accomplished. Bureaucratic inertia. But on an individual level, guys like you and me should be taking notes like crazy. You could probably get a lot of info just from this exercise:

Ask yourself what concerned you most during the crisis. Then ask what would have made you not concerned (or less concerned). Then, for next time, go do/get whatever that thing was that you think would have made you less concerned. Example:

What concerned you? I was worried we wouldn’t have money coming in to pay the bills.
What would had made you less concerned? Having money in the bank.
So for next time: have a large emergency fund saved up

What concerned you? The grocery stores would be devoid of food
What would had made you less concerned? Having a full pantry and freezer
So for next time: build a stockpile of stored food

What concerned you? I’d die because I’m already in poor health
What would had made you less concerned? Having taken better care of myself
So for next time: start what you can to get back into shape and being healthy

You get the idea, I’m sure.

Notably, it’s interesting to see what people rushed out and bought and in what order. According to virtually every source, toilet paper and rice/pasta were the first things erased from the supermarket shelves. It was only after a week or two, presumably when people had time to think, that they started figuring out what else they might want to stock up on.

Those things that the knee-jerk panic buyers bought? Those are things you should plan on becoming virtually instantly unobtainable. Keep plenty of those. As things progressed and people had more time to think, other stuff started disappearing. Noticing what went fast in those early days is a good indication of what you should already have had on hand.

Really forward thinkers got things done that otherwise are now rescheduled. Dental cleanings, vehicle maintenance, in-person banking (loans, mortgages), etc. That was pretty smart and something that didn’t occur to me until later.

Lotsa lessons to be learned in this crisis, guys. Just gotta keep your eyes and brain  open to learning them. Maybe the next pandemic won’t be for another hundred years like the last one, but we just don’t know. In the meantime, we’re getting first-hand real-world examples of how people will respond. Take it all in and use that information to your advantage.

His mind is not for rent….

If it bleeds, it leads. Thats the axiom when it comes to news. (Trivia: I started college as a journalism major. I finished as..well.. I’ll let you know.)

It seems that the Kung Flu is having to share time with blaring headlines about 31% unemployment coming soon. And our governor just announced a moratorium on evictions, utility shutoffs, and that sorta thing. A recession, defined as two consecutive quarters of decline in GDP, seems all but guaranteed. Prisons are emptying, hospitals are floundering, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria! Haven’t you heard? The world is coming to an end!

Darn hard to keep a smile going with that sort of news. But…is it really news? Is it real news? Is it the dreaded ‘fake news’? Or is it just the most sensational way to get click on Reuters website? Should I max out the credit cards with the expectation that the ‘boogaloo’ is about to happen? Or do I carefully navigate my way through the upcoming societal detritus to the inevitable upswing on the other side? Stuff is getting real, that seems certain….but the news…they only tell you the worst of it, right?

At this point, I’m really willing to start believing that news is subjective. Get your news from as many different sources as you can, apply some critical thinking, and then you decide for yourself whats really news.

My grandfather, a man from the era of a high school education being considered higher learning, read all three newspapers every night…The NY Times, The Daily News, and The NY Post. It never occurred to me, as a stupid kid, to ask him why he sat up late at night at the kitchen table, listening to WNEW’s Make Believe Ballroom on the radio, reading newspapers, but whatever the reason was I’m pretty sure that after reading those three papers, with their three disparate points of view, he had a more rounded and well-informed opinion about the news than most people.

I try to get my information from equally as disparate, dispassionate, and disconnected sources. I play both sides of the fence…I listen to Fox and I listen to NPR. I watch CNN and I watch BBC. I read the books people think everyone should read, and then I read the books people think no one should ever read. And then…I make up my own mind.

No doubt, there is trouble ahead….but how much trouble, what kind of trouble, and for how long…. no one seems to really have any statements that everyone else can agree on. So, I take them all in and try to filter them as best I can. I suppose I could play it safe and go with ‘worst case scenario’ but I think thats a tad uncalled for. I think I’m going to proceed carefully and deliberately in everything I do moving forward until such time as I can loosen my hands on the reins a bit. When will that be? Not sure, but, whether we like it or not,  we’re definitely going to find out.

Moral of the story: don’t believe everything you read, but don’t disbelieve it either. Put your bran cells to work and examine, inspect, question, and evaluate what you’re told. Then act accordingly.

The uniquely American perspective

Can we agree that, as far as the US is concerned, quarantines just don’t work? I’m not an epidemiologist, health professional, or anything like that … what I am is someone who comments on what I observe.  What I observe is that quarantines may work in other countries but I don’t think they’ll work here.

China implemented quarantines and they seem (if you can believe the communists) to have worked. But…China is a nation full of people who are quite used to saying ‘how high’ when the .gov tells them to jump. Many European countries are similar…people are used to a supremacy of .gov and believe that .gov is for ‘the greater good’. Thus, when ‘gov declares a crisis and says ‘do this’, the population usually toes the line.

And then you get the US… a nation whose entire national identity is based on BFYTW. Lots of folks already distrust .gov, no matter who is in office. And when they tell you to do something, our natural inclination is, often, to say “Yeah, no.”

So when .gov tells you, with a straight face and the wagging finger of seriousness, that you ‘must’ stay at home, avoid other people, not go to work, and generally be under house arrest…well, a lot of people are going to say ‘Yeah, screw that..I’m going to WalMart’. Some people say this is socially irresponsible and these people are selfish clowns who should be beaten with cluesticks until they stop putting others at risk….and theres some who say that individual freedom includes the freedom to make bad choices. (Although usually that argument doesn’t include those bad choices affecting anyone else except the individual in question.) But no matter which side you’re on (if there is a such thing as sides in this) I think it’s pretty obvious that quarantines won’t work in this country the way they do in others.

But…that’s why quarantines won’t work in the US. Short version: we are too individualistic to do what .gov tells us to do, and our .gov is quite reluctant to go to the measures that other countries do. The Chinese physically rounded up people off the street. The Italians have Carabinieri at checkpoints. The Germans…well…I don’t know what the Germans have but it’s probably really well-engineered and expensive…maybe some sort of virus-targetting laser robot thing. But the US is not the kind of country (yet) that rolls out nationwide roadblocks and military patrols to stuff coughing pedestrians into the back of unamarked vans for their own protection.

There are plenty of Americans who are obeying the .gov’s requests to stay at home. But those people aren’t motivated by patriotic altruism and obedience, they do it out of self-preservation because theyre in the target demographic for this thing. The young and dumb are out doing the same things as always because youth. And a quarantine is, I suspect like virginity…no grey areas. You either have a quarantine or you don’t. At this time, we don’t. And I don’t think we will, given the lack resolve to step into the jackboots of ugly-times-call-for-ugly-measures.

I am not a fan of big .gov. I’m rather pleased at the seeming impotence of .gov in terms of establishing the kind of control that other countries are exhibiting. Why? Because once you give a power to ‘gov, they virtually never relinquish it and they always find a way to use it. It’s a very personal choice, but I would rather take my chances at keeping my distance from other people, staying home as much as possible, and keeping outside trips to a minimum, by my own choice, and have a higher risk of catching this thing than have a lower chance of catching it in exchange for having guys with guns and uniforms driving around my neighborhood at night spotlighting houses looking for curfew violators.

But, it’s for those reasons that I dont think, barring some seriously unprecedented draconian responses by .gov, that quarantines will work here as well as they have elsewhere.

Grid up disasters

So far ( and that’s really a key modifier here) this kung flu thing is turning out to be, for the overwhelming majority, a ‘grid up’ scenario.

I don’t know about you but for me most of my wargaming and ‘possible scenarios’ against which I prepare involve a ‘grid down’ scenario. That’s the one where critical utility services are unavailable or strictly curtailed – no water, no electricity, no natural gas, that sort of thing. “The big one” earthquake? Grid down. Tornado? Grid down? Killer ice storm? Grid down. The kung flu is turning out (thus far) to be a ‘grid up’ scenario which, while not something I have discounted, was certainly not what I was anticipating.

Obviously, though, that ‘grid up’ thing can become ‘grid down’ in a hurry. All it takes is a bunch of self-quarantining linemen, power plant operators, electrical engineers, etc., staying home for the delivery systems to get stretched thin. I would guess that if you’re in a place that gets it’s power from nuclear plants the number of easily-replaced personnel running those things is pretty thin.

What’s that mean to me? Well, first of all, and I’m not sure this is a negative, it makes it a bit harder to interpret the current situation as a disaster. I mean, if we’re honest, when we were stocking away freeze drieds and tucking away cans of ammo we envisioned The Big Crisis as one where we would be in the dark and cold, using candles and kerosene lamps, cooking over our grills and campstoves, and heating water in big pots over campfires. Right now? I turn the handle marked “H” on my sink and hot water comes out. I flip on the lightswitch and my room lights up. I press a button on the wall and my house gets warmer. It’s a bit hard to not have a little mental disconnect.

Here’s an example of what I mean – I’m assuming many of you watch The Walking Dead, and if you don’t I am certain you at least know the premise. For the first few seasons our heroes (such as they are) lived in abandoned buildings, campsites, etc, with no running water, electricity, etc, etc. It was a very close to the edge existence. Later in the show they find a haven with running water and electricity….a sense of normalcy develops, despite the fact the zombies are just outside the walls.  My point being that while intellectually I know this is a very serious time, the relative lack of obvious impact on my day-to-day is making it hard to feel like it’s as big a deal as it is.

One thing I had not considered, at all, was the possibility that in a ‘grid up’ crisis those grid up utilities could be manipulated by others to force a control on me. For example, in places that have ordered ‘non essential’ businesses to close, municipalities are threatening to turn off utility services to businesses that don’t comply. That’s only a step or two away from turning off utilities to neighborhoods to force them to evacuate to quarantine locations or to exact some other sort of behavioral change. I never thought of that, had you?

The “Hmm-I-Never-Considered-That” moments are starting to come a bit faster these days. When all of this blows over (or, at least, diminishes a bit) there’s going to be some frenzied activity in the blogosphere as people recount what they should have done and will do differently ‘next time’.

Too normal to panic, too weird to be calm

I don’t know about you, but the Kung Flu seems a little unreal and real at the same time. I mean, on the one hand all the media are talking about corpses littering hospital hallways, government continuity plans, cordoning off neighborhoods, etc…very dramatic stuff. But on the other hand I look outside my window and…traffic continues to roll by, the lights are on, people bicycle along the sidewalk, etc….but then I go to the supermarket and see empty aisles and purchase limits, my classes are shifted to online, and restaurants are closed….but my  mailman delivers my mail, the gas stations are open, the toilets still flush. It’s like a mixture of messages. Its almost like theres not enough crazy stuff happening to push me into panic mode, but there’s not enough normal stuff to keep me from worrying. It’s a very in-between kinda thing.

One problem I anticipate is remaining consistent and vigilant for the unpredictable length of this crisis. As I said, there’s enough ‘normal’ going on right now that it’s a bit hard to immerse myself in a ‘conserve’ mindset. At the same time there’s enough crazy going on to instill anxiety and dread in me that I should be ‘doing something’. And without that very obvious in-your-face threat, it becomes a bit tough to tread lightly on the Pop Tarts, rice, and bleach.

I suppose part of it is my locale. Folks in the big cities, I suspect, see it a bit more on the ‘panic’ or weird side than we do here in flyover country. Perhaps thats the only thing they’ve got going for them…the situation is such that there is no ambiguity, no half-measures.

The key to succeeding at any endeavour is persistence and discipline. I need to stick to the mindset of ‘London during the blitz’ and not let the lack of blatantly obvious dire threat lull me into a state of complacency (or worse – waste).

But…still got plenty of TP.

 

Seeing the apocalyptic forest for the disastrous trees

In Hazlitt’s book, ‘Economics In One Lesson’, which I highly recommend to you, he says “…The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.”

You could replace economics with preparedness, and event for policy, and have yourself a handy little rubric for wargaming future preparations.

One thing that I’ve always found terribly irritating about many survivalists is the tunnel vision, or, perhaps more accurately, lack of situational awareness in regard to a particular disaster or event. This current situation of coronavirus is a perfect example of what I mean.

This Kung Flu checks off the ‘pandemic’ tickybox on our checklist of “things we prepare against”. Admittedly, it was right down there with ‘nuclear war’ and ‘comet strike’ in terms of probability on many people’s lists. After all, the last time something like this happened was around a hundred years ago…so it really wasn’t on too many peoples radar. We leaned more towards hurricanes, riots, economic collapses, and that sort of thing.

The thing is, while people may have planned for, or anticipated, a pandemic and made some plans to protect themselves, I would wager that a large percentage of them didn’t think through what else a pandemic brings that you need to prepare against.

An example: When Hurricane Sandy hit New York many people lost their vehicles because of the flooding. Most had insurance that covered the loss, so they sat back and figured they were set. Their inner dialogue went something like this:

“Flooding will occur. I’ll probably lose my car. Let me make sure my insurance will cover it. It does? Great, I’m all set.”

And virtually no one had this inner dialogue:

“Flooding will occur. I’ll probably lose my car. Let me make sure my insurance will cover it. It does? Great. But since I won’t have a car I’ll need to make arrangements for a rental. And fuel. And directions to other supermarkets if my main one is flooded out.” etc, etc.

And this is exactly what happened. People lost their cars but when their insurance said “hey, we’ll cover a rental car for you” those same people found that every rental car for fifty miles in every direction was already rented by people who thought ahead. See, they got so focused on the event (losing their car) that they didn’t think about the consequences of the event (no car rentals being available).

It seems a lot of people worry about the event and put little focus into the effects of the event. The Kung Flu is like that. Everyone stocked up on hand sanitizer and toilet paper, but how many made plans for when the kids school is closed, the paycheck is stalled because you’ve been told not to come into work, the guy who was gonna fix your car is out with the Kung Flu, your AirBNB rental income slumped as tourists stay home, your wife’s housecleaning ‘side gig’ drops to zero as people don’t want strangers in their house, etc, etc. And meanwhile, your mortgage, taxes, utilities, and credit card bills are all still due.

You drop a rock in a pond and ripples radiate out, right? That’s a fair metaphor, I think. The disaster occurs and we focus on that point where the rock hits the water and we don’t think about the ripples that emanate outwards. RIght now one of the biggest ripples is the amazing contortions the stock market is going through. I’d wager that no one, when planning a few years ago for Capt. Tripps, had the foresight to think “Y’know, when that superflu comes through and starts doing its thing, the markets are going to tank…I should probably be ready for that.”

There’s that old expression about not seeing the forest because all the trees are in the way. The forest is the larger, greater, overall chaos and disorder that results from a particular event. We tend to get so fixated on the individual events (trees) that we don’t see the entirety of what chaos theyve created (forest).

Hurricane Katrina, fifteen years ago, was a benchmark for disaster preparation. I have absolutely zero doubt that the Kung Flu of 2020 will be remembered as a black swan event that changed disaster planning for many organizations, governments, and individuals.

The lesson to be learned seems pretty straightforward – when you prepare for a particular event, you need to look at all the possible negative effects that event could cause and you have to be ready for them as well. You have to look as far ‘downstream’ from the disaster as possible and try to see what the consequences will be and how you can best prepare for them.

Did I get caught napping? Honestly, yes. I should have had more money sitting in my brokerage accounts to take advantage of stocks and funds being on sale at 25% off. That’s it. That’s all I’d change. I have enough cash in the bank, and no liabilities, to cover me for a few months if I’m unable to bring in income. No mortgage to sweat, no credit card payments to stress over, no car loan to dread, no student loan to fear. To some degree, I’m insulated from the fallout from coronavirus even if I’m not immune to the coronavirus itself.

So, assuming we all survive this, we should analyze the whole thing, start to finish, and see what lessons we learn from it.

 

 

Identity survivalism?

I’ve known quite a few survivalists over the years. Some better than others, but all survivalists, of some stripe, nonetheless. I’ve known left-handed survivalists, brown-eyed survivalists, and I’ve even known a bald survivalist. Now, if you re-read that last sentence you are, I would imagine, asking yourself “WTF cares about a survivalist being brown-eyed?” or some similar thought. I phrased it that way because I kinda get that some “WTF cares?” when I see articles about [gay/black/female/insert marginalized group] survivalists. Case in point:I Tried To Keep Up With Black Survivalists Who Are Ready For Any Disaster.

Do black survivalists keep different blankets in their car during the winter than white survivalists? (I asked this question rhetorically to someone and then flippantly followed it up with ‘although I suppose they don’t keep as many white sheets as the white survivalists’. Bad Zero, bad.) Do black survivalists use different brands of home canning equipment than white survivalists? Do black survivalists stockpile different mouthwash, batteries, band-aids, and bleach than white survivalists? Pretty much no. So why the need to identify as ‘black survivalist’? (as an aside, the article features a link to Aton Edwards, whom we first met waaaaaay back here)

I suppose the seemingly rational answer might be “Well, black populations earn less than white populations, live in completely different (meaning urban) environments than white populations, and face great disparity in how they are treated.” Ignoring, for a moment, that attributing particular traits and qualities to a particular demographic based solely on race is…well..pretty much the textbook definition of racism…..so what? Aren’t there plenty of ‘other’ that also earn less, live elsewhere, and get treated poorly?

I’ve met gay survivalists, female survivalists, Asian survivalists, and while I have never met a black survivalist (the odds are pretty strong against it in a state as homogenous as mine) I cannot fathom that we’d get along any differently than if we both racked the same numbers on the Pantone chart.

I’m not sure why anyone needs (or wants) to throw a self-descriptive adjective before the term ‘survivalist’ when identifying themselves (gay survivalist, black survivalist, wiccan survivalist, Armenian survivalist, flatulent survivalist, etc.) You’re a survivalist…period, full stop.

I suppose the one reason that might have some merit is to meet and join with ‘like’. The gay survivalist wants to associate with other gay survivalists, the Asian survivalist wants to hang with other Asian survivalists, etc. People, broadly, tend to be more ‘at home; with people who mirror themselves in some way…beliefs, race, orientation, age, etc…..so I suppose that could be a reason. But, generally speaking, just call yourself a ‘survivalist’ and leave it at that. After all no one responds to questions about their occupation with “Im an Italian accountant”, “I’m a Lutheran plumber”, “I’m a male housepainter”, “I’m a Jewish insurance claims adjuster”.

Identity politics has already led to all sorts of nonsense and problems…why bring it into survivalism?

The problem with thinking your done thinking about something

It occurred to me today that when youve been a survivalist long enough, its easy to lose track of whats available out there to improve your situation. Let me give you an example: Twenty years ago you decided to go deep and stock on high quality flashlights. You figured you’d buy the best, tuck ’em away, and then you’d be done with the flashlight component of your preps. Seems reasonable, right? So you go out and spend your money on a dozen top of the line MagLights with the bright Krypton bulbs (and spares). You tuck them away and figure “Thats that. I’m done.”

Here’s where the problem comes in. Because you think you’ve sewed up the flashlight side of things you now stop even thinking about them. After all, you have a dozen of the best flashlights available tucked away…so why bother thinking about them anymore? Fast forward twenty years to today…and whats the standard in flashlights? LEDs. Flashlights that give three times the brightness, for 2/3 the cost, and 10x the battery life. And, because you stopped thinking about flashlights twenty years ago, you have no idea such things even exist. So, while you were cutting edge for 1999, you are now hopelessly fourth-tier for 2019.

Other examples might include newer and better magazines, optics, radio gear, battery management devices, knife sharpeners, etc, etc. The trap is in thinking that because you are all squared away with ‘X’ that you don’t have to keep track of changes and improvements in ‘X’ developments. It’s like tucking away your old-school XM177 CAR-15 in 1985 and never discovering it had evolved to the M4.

I’m guilty of this sort of lack of thinking from time to time. For example, I’ve a Leatherman Wave that I’ve had for over ten years now and I’ve been pleased with it. So pleased, in fact, that in never occurred to me to see if they had come out with better, more useful, versions since then. And, of course, they have. So while I was happy with what I had, I was lacking the the efficiency of the newer tool. You might ask, since you were happy with the older one, and you were unaware of the newer one, were you not then, in fact, not really missing anything? You are correct, I was not aware of what I was missing. But that doesn’t mean I may not have been better served with the newer tool.

Survivalism is about being able to improve your chances and lower your risks (threats) in a bad situation. You don’t necessarily need the ‘latest and greatest’ to do that, but many times the latest and greatest are improvements over the older. There will be no award after the apocalypse for the guy who achieved the most using the least amount of gear. If you want to ride out the apocalypse in travel trailer on a piece of junk land, eating beans and rice stored in 2-liter pop bottles, and shooting jackrabbits with your HiPoint carbine…..have at it. But given a choice, I’ll go for the higher end of the price charts… not beause I’m a snob, but because ‘good enough’ is not the adjective I want for crap that might someday have to be relied on to keep me safe and alive.

So, moral of the story: even if you think you have so many of something that you don’t need to think about them anymore…..think about them.

 

Choosey? Uzi.

,Rawles had an article on his website about the Uzi the other day. As you know, years ago I picked up an Uzi after carefully trying come up with a non-SBR solution to a rugged,proven, 9mm carbine that would take down into a package small enough to fit in your average ‘three day pack’. At the time, there were not a lot of choices…while there were guns on the market that fit most of the criteria, virtually all of them were new designs that did not have a proven and established track record in terms of performance and durability. When I lucked out and fell into an Uzi, it pretty much hit all the high points in terms of what I was looking for.

You have to keep in mind that, nowadays, a ‘wrist brace’ lets you create short-barrelled ‘not a carbine’ guns quite easily, but at the time I acquired the Uzi that was not an option. So, since we are in a new era of designs and rule-bender/beater gimmicks like the wrist brace, would I still go with the Uzi.

Honestly, probably not…for that purpose.

THe Uzi is a fine gun, no two ways about it. But like the M1 Garand, or the 1911, it was a fine gun for it’s time. And times change. The Uzi has a few things going against it as a semi-auto carbine…scant availability of accessories, not ambidextrous, very heavy, virtually no optics mounting options, etc, etc. Compare and contrast the Uzi against something more contemporary like, say, a CZ Evo or Sig MPX, and you can see that the design is pretty dated and doesn’t offer the features we’ve gotten used to in more recent designs.

What the Uzi does have, in spades, is a proven history. It’s been around long enough to have figured out what works and what doesnt work. Other guns like the MPX, Evo, etc, are too new to have decades of experience behind them.

The reason I wanted a takedown carbine was to have something compact enough to be extremely portable, but carry a goodly amount of firepower. If the world came crashing down and I had a need to have a high-capacity ‘long gun’, the Uzi would be the one tucked in the bag under my desk.

Nowadays though…I’d trade it out for the Ruger PC9 in an aftermarket sidefolding chasis, or a ‘wrist braced’ 9″ AR style gun. Why? It comes down to one big factor – logistics. A half dozen Glock magazines, 17- or 33-rd, can be interchanged between pistol and carbine, streamlining logistics considerably.

Some people will, of course, say that the issue of magazine interchangeability is overblown and that the tradeoff of stepping down to a pistol caliber, versus a rifle caliber, for the sake of magazine interchangeability is a bad tradeoff. Well, as it turns out, if I wrist braced a 9″ .223 AR pistol the reduction in ballistics performance drops me down to almost identical energy of a 9mm +p. In other words, the .223 out of a ‘wrist braced’ AR pistol fairly equals a 9mm out of a 16″ carbine. There’s more to it, of course… the .223, even at the lower velocity, will shoot flatter and probably penetrate a bit better but with the similar ballistics I’d rather have the option of not having to keep two different kinds of magazines in my bag and on my belt.

I’m not foolish enough to say that money isn’t a consideration when choosing gear that may someday be called upon to keep you hale and hearty, but it shouldn’t be an overriding consideration. AN original IMI Uzi, in semi-auto, is going to set you back somewhere in the $1200-2000 range depending on a few factors like caliber, condition, and accessories. For that money you could buy two or three CZ or Ruger guns, or one gun and a metric crapload of magazines and accessories. The acquisition of my Uzi was serendipitous so I got an exceptionally good deal on mine. Your mileage will vary.

Options? The CZ Evo is sweet and I do have one with a buncha mags. It does everything my Uzi does at half the weight and price. The Ruger, once I get it geared out, will probably cost as much as the Uzi but will have several features, described earlier, that the Uzi never had. Additionally, there are other guns out there these days that give you the traits and features I was looking but those are the two that immediately spring to mind.

The future of my Uzi? I’ll keep it, of course. It’s an excellent house gun, a good vehicle gun, and it has a certain visual impact that is pretty hard to get elsewhere. But I suspect I’ll be dumping some money into the Ruger PC9 to optimize it for my anticipated needs and purposes.